I have a question, how much dirtier is the air flowing into the engine than with the factory filter set up? I always hear that less restrictive air filters will funnel more air into the engine but also filter less dirt and dust.
Interesting question.
A cone filter flows more air by virtue of it's size. If you simply measure the square inch size of the factory filter and compare it to the K&N cone filter you will find the cone filter has nearly TWICE the filter area for air to flow through.
I'd have to go get the numbers but I think the stock filter is @55 sq.in. While the K&N filter is @111 sq.in.
Do you live in a dusty or sandy climate in which you have to worry about MICRON-sized particles (which, if injested by an engine 99.9999% go right out the exhaust)?
From a website on this matter.
"Most of these amateur air filter tests are conducted on new filters where the smallest pores haven’t been plugged. So the tester injects extremely fine particles and measures how many of those particles pass through the filter media’s pores. Does that result mean anything? No.
It only means that on day one of use, one filter may outperform another filter. But is the test valid in the real world where larger particles plug the smallest pores first? If those “failed” filters had been in use for a week, their smallest pores would have been plugged and that same failed filter would be even more efficient than the “passing filter.”
Air filter manufacturers aren’t stupid
All automotive air filter manufacturers known what the ISO and SAE tests are and they manufacture their filters to pass those standards. They have way too much liability at risk to not pay attention to those filtration standards.
Air filter manufacturers use different filtering materials for each vehicle design. Some incorporate a mix of cellulose and synthetic fibers for a certain make and model, but change the ingredients for a different engine.
If the air filter tester isn’t using ISO or SAE testing procedures, then their tests aren’t accurate."
-Something interesting came up on the Forte GT - it has been found that Kia blocked most of the particles from getting to the intake filter by using a plate that forces the air to go around it and the particles don't make the journey. What happened is that owners who installed the Velossa-Tech big mouth intake (which removes that plate and allows incoming air to go straight to the filter) found their filters were getting dirty VERY quickly!
-K&N has been around a LONG time. Are they good? That question is answered many ways...depends on who is answering it. I seriously doubt K&N would be as popular as they are if their filters caused problems. I've used K&N filters on many of my cars for as long as 8 years and never had a problem. I also have never cleaned a K&N filter because I replace them instead of cleaning them - that's just my way.
____
Here's a typical ASININE youtube video - as if the K&N filter is the fault:
Why K&N Air Filters Are Bad For You - YouTube
I would say the filter was doing it's job of keeping trash out. The owner was negligent - for the dirty filter and for not keeping the filter on - not K&N.